Tuesday, June 30, 2009

Doctor dilemma

I had an appointment with the lady doctor yesterday. My usual doctor retired sometime last year without telling me, and since she supposedly hand-picked the woman who replaced her, I decided there was no reason to search for someone else.

Well, the new lady was disappointing. She seemed competent enough and I do give her credit for being on time and not wasting any of mine, but there was no personal interaction, no bedside manners. It was all business—she probably said less than fifty words to me the entire time I was there.

The visit was adequate; I got the prescription I needed. But for a routine checkup, it was too routine. I miss my old doctor, a witty grandmother figure who I could talk to about anything, who I could ask any question. Yesterday I was so grateful there was not a pressing issue I wanted to discuss, because I would not have felt comfortable opening up to this stranger who made no effort to be otherwise.

The problem is, I don't know how to find a better replacement. I guess next year I can pick someone random from the list of doctors who take my insurance, but I'm loathe to subject my private parts to chance. And it's not like these people are reviewed on Yelp!

All of this is just to say I wish there were health counselors who could help match patients up with doctors, and I'm not talking about 1-800-DOCTORS. The services would have to be unbiased and the necessary analyses pretty complex, but surely it is possible to create a trustworthy network of healthcare providers. This is the kind of problem I feel my generation should be solving. Does complaining count as a start?

Monday, June 29, 2009

A belated warning

I didn't have a blog when the following occurred, but if I had you would have learned about this incident immediately. Instead, a belated account:

My mom is interested in Snuggie ownership. I don't understand why, but that's all right, because one does not have to understand the desire for something in order to give that something as a gift, especially if one is shopping for Mother's Day.

I'm not a huge Internet shopper but I've bought enough online goods to know the drill: You put items in your cart, review your order + shipping costs, confirm a total, and you're set. Somewhere along the way you provide payment information, but I've learned you can input credit card numbers with no consequence as long as you don't confirm your purchase.

Unless you're on the Snuggie website. If you're on the Snuggie website, "having a look around" is synonymous with "purchasing Snuggies whether you like it or not."


I probably wouldn't have found this out if their website had any modicum of usability or customization options. As it was, I had no choice but to click, click my way to a checkout window, never getting to specify what exactly it was I was agreeing to buy. I was not given the option to decline the buy-one-get-one-free "special offer," and so even though I was only (potentially) interested in purchasing a single Snuggie, I had no way of selecting just one. Nor could I opt out of receiving two free book lights. That might not have been so bad, if I had any use for book lights or if the second sleeved blanket was actually going to be free. But it wouldn't be—I would be charged extra shipping and handling.

That glitch alone was enough to make me start brainstorming for alternative gift options, but since I was curious to see the final cost, I continued letting the automated website force me through it's inflexible sequence of pages. For an extra $5 I agreed to upgrade my (theoretical) Snuggie to something with pockets and fabric thicker than cheesecloth. I did not have the option of applying these impressive features to just one Snuggie. The second, unwelcome item would also be of deluxe quality and added expense. Nor was I able to select more than one color option...my "free" Snuggie would apparently have to be identical to the one I (supposedly) wanted to buy.

At that point I had $30 worth of sleeved blankets in my cart, despite my single-Snuggie intentions. The next screen asked for payment info, but no total cost was listed, and no confirmation button was shown. Since I was still curious to find out the final cost—and since I was still hoping to ditch the second product—I played along. I gave them a credit card number. And this is what I saw next:


Thank you for your order! It is being processed and will be shipped promptly!

The amount my credit card had been charged without my consent was $49.63. Thoroughly convinced by then that I did NOT want a Snuggie, I immediately contacted Customer Service. A kind young man answered the phone and did not sound surprised when I explained my situation. He told me that my credit card would not actually be charged until the order shipped, but I would have to call back to cancel the order. Nice Guy explained that the computer system only updated order info twice a day, at 8:30 a.m. and at 5 p.m. Since it was about 11 a.m., my best bet was to call again just after 5. He emphatically suggested I not wait until the morning—in his experience, most orders shipped by then and it would be too late to cancel.

I don't think either one of us believed an Internet-based operation in the twenty-first century was incapable of immediately processing orders, but it was obvious a system was firmly in place and there was nothing he could do to change it, other than pass along the details he knew.

When I called at 5:10 p.m., a gruff voice informed me that my order information had not yet entered the system. When I cited Nice Guy's tip about the 5 p.m. update, Gruff Guy didn't seem to know what I was talking about. He told me to call in the morning. I asked if it would be better for me to call back later that evening—the call center was open until 10—but he said there was no point in doing so.

At 9:15 a.m. the next morning I explained my situation for the third time to the third person, and the first sentence out of his mouth after I gave him my order number was, "Oh, no, honey, that's on the truck."

I think it is pretty shady to thank someone for an order they never confirmed, but it is even shadier to pretend you don't know about that order until it is too late for the customer to cancel it. Fortunately for me, Mr. Third Time's the Charm agreed. He told me Gruff Guy should have never told me to wait till morning. He told me what he could do and what he could not do.

He could not keep the unwanted Snuggies from heading toward my home. He could not keep the charge for them off my credit card. But he could, and did, immediately remove the $15.90 shipping charges. And he assured me that if I refused to accept the package when it arrived, the blanket fees would eventually be removed from my credit card.

Because I never opened the box that showed up some two weeks later (too late for Mother's Day, by the way, even if I'd had a change of heart and decided to keep the things), I'll never know exactly what I escaped involuntarily owning. But I know what I didn't escape: a long, painful process that left me—and my unblanketed arms—cold.




Saturday, June 27, 2009

In my dreams


The best and worst part about my dreams is not being able to control them. I am frequently surprised by the cast of characters who populate my subconscious world on any given night, and sometimes I awaken confused or even upset by the contents of a dream.

This morning though? This morning I opened my eyes to streams of sunlight and smiled at a vivid recollection of what had moments earlier seemed like reality.

It sounds cliche but has never happened to me before: I was flying.

IT WAS AWESOME.

Granted, since it was me dreaming, the flying was of a practical nature. I didn't suddenly turn into Superman or have the ability to cross oceans. It was more like windsurfing in a bridesmaid dress. That's right. I was outdoors before the wedding began and there was a mighty strong breeze blowing, and I figured out that if I leaned forward and lifted the back of my dress just so, the generous folds of fabric would catch the wind and lift me off the ground. Before long I sure was zooming around that garden party, whooping with glee and loving it. Thanks, dream!


Thursday, June 25, 2009

The fabric of equality

I can't afford to care too much about fashion, but when I take the bus to work I usually pass by the Kenneth Cole store on Fifth Avenue and, though I've never paid much attention to the clothes, his campaigns catch my eye. The tag lines are usually slyly political, and today's window display was no exception:

THOSE AGAINST
SAME-SEX
MARRIAGE
AREN'T THINKING
STRAIGHT.
(OR ARE THEY?)
—KENNETH COLE

It is pretty bold to tell a chunk of your consumer base that their thinking is flawed, but throw in the right parenthetical, and you've challenged people to consider a new perspective. Thought provoking, clever...and available on a T shirt.




Wednesday, June 24, 2009

Internally, eternally free

...That's the goal, anyway. And wisdom like this helps me get there.

DAILY INSPIRATION

Do you feel free to be who you are? If not, why not? Who or what are you allowing to limit your freedom to be yourself? No one but you can give you your inner freedom.

By Dr. Margaret Paul

Music FYI

My awesome friend Susan makes theses amazing mix CDs that she periodically distributes to her pals, and in the last four years she has enhanced my music collection with approximately 600 songs. I can't match her aptitude for compiling fantastic tunes, but I can at least pass along my own latest discoveries:

P.T. Walkley has two albums out: Mr. Macy Wakes Alone, and PTWalkley...and the Adventures of Track Rabbit. Both are great—Mr. Macy is his new one and a little more low key, but it's very easy to listen to the two albums in one stretch. His style reminds me of The Shins with a little bit of Arctic Monkeys thrown in, and I'm a sucker for fun music with coherent/clever lyrics.

Diane Birch has been compared to Norah Jones and Carole King, and while I can see why, I wouldn't try to label her (although her soulful, self-written music does remind me of a few of my favorite songs by Brandi Carlile). Her debut album, Bible Belt, is currently available for cheap on iTunes, and definitely worth the $7.

Nylon Magazine's 22 Free Tracks are an excellent substitute for a Summer Mix from Susan, and I credit her fully for letting me know about this rockin' assortment of freebies. Check out Nylon's site to download a playlist of your very own.

Starbucks made me do it.

I decided to start a blog after realizing yesterday that my internal filter works too well. I used to speak any thought, but years of New York City living have (ironically?) taught me to keep quiet—no one cares what's on my mind. And while it is often for the best that I remain silent, there was a time when I had an ever-present listening audience who welcomed my random thoughts and inappropriate comments.

That time was college, and it is past. But the people who so enriched my life are alive and well, dispersed across the globe and Internet accessible. And so, this blog is for them. Well, mostly for me. But also for them. And, okay, by nature of its format, also for anyone online. But definitely for them. Because I will not join Twitter and I update my Facebook status sparingly. I do not believe in force-feeding information. But I do believe it is possible that people just maybe might be interested in my occasional observations, particularly people who know me and my (in)sensibilities.

And I just have to say something about the Starbucks ad I saw yesterday. The copy reads:

STARBUCKS OR NOTHING
Because compromise leaves a really bad aftertaste.

I was equal parts impressed and disgusted when I saw this poster encased in glass on the side of a bus stop. I know Starbucks has lost some money, but is disparaging compromise going to earn them business? It's like the company is encouraging consumers to behave like spoiled brats: If I can't have the expensive brew, I won't have any!
But the ad is brilliant in its logic, because the two options create a win-win situation: Customers either buy Starbucks, or they don't buy coffee anywhere else (presumably staving off defects to Dunkin' Donuts). And given that coffee is addictive, it's a safe bet the "nothing" option is essentially null. So, well done Starbucks. Way to promote snobbery and stubbornness. Just what we need more of in NYC.

[Note: This post was written while sipping on a Starbucks grande iced coffee with free hazelnut syrup and soy milk. At $2.11 (tax included), it cost about the same as an iced coffee from Dunkin' Donuts, and free syrup and soy milk are harder to ignore than appalling ads.]